Armand Rousso posted a response on his blog following the story by Saul Hansell published last week in the New York Times. Rousso points out several inaccuracies in Hansell’s writing and suggests unprofessional conduct on his part in writing the article. Besides being unrelated to the main focal point of the story, Rousso also expresses his regret on Hansell’s insistence on dealing with Rousso’s past which contained a crime he confessed to. He indicates his view that a person should be given a chance to change and prove himself changed without constant dwelling on a specific dark side of his past. You can read the full Armand Rousso response to NYT story by Saul Hansell here.